Comparison

Vibe vs cloud hosting

Deploying to Vercel, Railway, Render, or Fly is how you publish a product. When you just need to hand someone a build, a single .vibeapp skips the account, the pipeline, and the bill.

Concern Vibe (.vibeapp) Cloud hosting
Account / signupNoneRequired
Deploy pipelinePackage one fileBuild + deploy config
InfrastructureRuns on recipient's MacAlways-on servers
Ongoing costFreeRecurring bill
Secrets & env exposureStays local, sandboxedManaged in the platform
How you deliver itSend a fileShare a URL you maintain
Works offlineYesNo

Where cloud hosting fits

If you're shipping a public product that needs a stable URL, uptime, and shared access, deploy it. That's what platforms like Vercel and Railway are for, and Vibe doesn't compete with that.

Where a .vibeapp fits

For a demo for a client, a prototype for a teammate, an internal tool, or a review copy, hosting is overkill — you'd be standing up (and paying for) infrastructure just to show one person something. With Vibe you package the whole app into one signed .vibeapp and send it. It runs locally and sandboxed on the recipient's Mac, with its database and services included and state auto-saved every 30 seconds. Nothing to deploy, nothing to keep running, nothing to take down later.

Related